HOME ABOUT ME SITE MAP A MEDIEVAL WOMAN'S LIFE - AT HOME - BIRTHS - WEDDINGS - DIVORCE - DEATHS - MANNERS - EDUCATION - EMPLOYMENT - RECREATION
CLOTHES - ITEMS OF CLOTHING - DRESS ACCESSORIES FABRICS & SEWING BEAUTY, HEALTH & HYGIENE MY TALKS MY SEWING MY ARTIFACTS BIBLIOGRAPHY LINKS

FABRICS & SEWING

SEWING TOOLS

SEWING TECHNIQUES
& TUTORIALS

BASIC CLOTHING PATTERNS & TUTORIALS

COMMERCIAL PATTERNS & WHAT TO DO ABOUT THEM

DYES & COLOURS

FABRIC, FUR & LEATHER NAMES

EMBELLISHMENTS & EMBROIDERY

BUTTONS & LACINGS

Medieval Buttons & Gown Lacings
BUTTONS - LACINGS - FRONT LACING - BACK LACING - SIDE LACING

Kirtles and gowns closed either one of two ways- with buttons or with lacing. Some closed at the front, others at the back, others at the side seams depending on what the garment was used for and whether it was an overgarment or worn underneath. By the 13th century, buttons were in everyday use for clothing, although the materials they were made from and the number of them on any one garment varied greatly.

Some illustrations show buttons from wrist to elbow or right up the back of the upper arm. Buttons were usually set very closely together. Seen at right is a pewter badge of a milk maid from the late 14th century from London. The buttons down the front of her kirtle and the entire length of her sleeves are clearly visible.

Buttons
Buttons down the front of a lady's kirtle could be made from matching cloth of the gown they were intended for or of metal or semiprecious stones set into metal clasps. Cloth buttons were always ball-shaped. As with almost every other aspect of medieval clothing, it depended on what occasion the gown was to be worn and who was wearing it.

Lower classes would have to be content with matching cloth buttons, while the upper classes would have preferred yet another chance to display their social superiority on their clothing with metal buttons.

Above left is a beautiful example of a late 14th century tin button with glass stone set into it. It has a shank and is from the collection at the Museum of London. Above right is pictured a round, gold button from the 10th century which also looks similar to the Uppsala Gown buttons.

Shown at right is a garment fragment from the 1400s from the Museum of London showing the sleeve and cloth buttons. Unlike modern buttons, they were set at the very edge of the garment opening and not set in from the seam like today, as shown at right. Flat, modern buttons with two or four holes drilled right through seem to be unworn at that time. Toggles, however, appear known but not generally worn on clothing except as cloak fastenings.

Lacings
In medieval clothing terms, the word lace refers to lacing, like our modern shoe-lacing, not of fancy, frilly lace. Lace was used extensively to close gown fronts, backs and sleeves at various periods of time. Lacings were also used by men to attach hose and for arming, which we won't look at here.

Cord produced on a lucet produced a square braid or lace. This lace was strong, durable and didn't easily slip when used for garment fastenings. Many other braids and laces are made using the fingerlooping method- that is a method of looping the thread around the fingers to form a kind of knotted braid. Plaiting is also another method of making laces for clothing or shoes.

Front lacing
Front lacing on kirtles and gowns can be seen abundantly in paintings. Many images of the Madonna breastfeeding show the front of her kirtle unlaced. Shown at left is a detail from Bouquet'sVirgin and Child Surrounded by Angels, dated 1450. Other images which show front lacing gowns on noble women are the 1387 Bearosin Getting Engaged detail at right from a Prague manuscript and the Kathryn de Mortimer funeral effigy.

Lacing holes seem to be very close set to avoid gaping on the front of the dress. Lacing eyelets could be somewhere between 2cm and 2.5cm apart but no more. An upper-class woman's under-dress would almost certainly be laced. A buttoned dress under another buttoned overgown would not only be uncomfortable but cause unsightly lumps down the front of the outer layer.

A working class women would have been likely to wear a front-lacing kirtle, as she would be able to dress herself relatively quickly and without assistance. Lacing also provides a very solid closure, affording a fair amount of structural support which is not possible with buttons which gape and give way at the buttonholes when too much pressure is exerted.

Back lacing
Back lacing on kirtles and gowns are the domain of the wealthy. A working class woman who did not have a servant to help her dress would not have been able to lace herself into her clothes unaided. Many paintings and illuminations show women wearing garments which have no apparent openings at the front or sides, and therefore probably lace at the back.

Many books on historical costuming, including Herbert Norris's Medieval Costume and Fashion and Dion Clayton Calthrop's English Costume cite back lacing in the early medieval period. In the early period, lacing seems only to shape the dress from between the shoulder blades and down the upper to mid back. This kind of lacing did not extend all the way to the top of the garment as became common later in the 14th century.

Side lacing
Side lacing on garments is usually seen on images of young mothers-to-be. The ability to loosen a garment at the side seams to accommodate an expanding stomach and then pull it tight again after the birth of a child, made special maternity clothes unnecessary.

There are some images which show side lacing on domestic garments also- in the manuscript shown at the right, we see a side laced pink gown and in a 15th century painting we again see a side lacing on a woman mourning Christ on the cross.

Copyright © Rosalie Gilbert
All text & photographs within this site are the property of Rosalie Gilbert unless stated.
Art & artifact images remain the property of the owner.
Images and text may not be copied and used without permission.