CLOTHING PATTERNS & TUTORIALS
COMMERCIAL PATTERNS & WHAT
TO DO ABOUT THEM
FUR & LEATHER NAMES
Buttons & Gown Lacings
BUTTONS - LACINGS - FRONT LACING - BACK LACING -
and gowns closed either one of two ways- with buttons or with lacing.
Some closed at the front, others at the back, others at the side seams
depending on what the garment was used for and whether it was an overgarment
or worn underneath. By the 13th century, buttons were in everyday use
for clothing, although the materials they were made from and the number
of them on any one garment varied greatly.
Some illustrations show buttons from wrist to elbow or right up the
back of the upper arm. Buttons were usually set very closely together.
Seen at right is a pewter badge of a milk maid from the late 14th century
from London. The buttons down the front of her kirtle and the entire
length of her sleeves are clearly visible.
Buttons down the front of a lady's kirtle could be made from matching
cloth of the gown they were intended for or of metal or semiprecious
stones set into metal clasps. Cloth
buttons were always ball-shaped. As with almost every other aspect of
medieval clothing, it depended on what occasion the gown was to be worn
and who was wearing it.
Lower classes would have to be content with matching cloth buttons,
while the upper classes would have preferred yet another chance to display
their social superiority on their clothing with metal buttons.
Above left is a beautiful example of a
late 14th century tin button with glass stone set into it. It has a
shank and is from the collection at the Museum of London. Above
right is pictured a round, gold button from the 10th century which also
looks similar to the Uppsala Gown buttons.
Shown at right is a garment fragment from
the 1400s from the Museum of London showing the sleeve and cloth buttons.
Unlike modern buttons, they were set at the very edge of the garment
opening and not set in from the seam like today, as shown at right.
Flat, modern buttons with two or four holes drilled right through seem
to be unworn at that time. Toggles, however, appear known but not generally
worn on clothing except as cloak fastenings.
In medieval clothing terms, the word lace refers to lacing, like
our modern shoe-lacing, not of fancy, frilly lace. Lace was used extensively
to close gown fronts, backs and sleeves at various periods of time.
Lacings were also used by men to attach hose and for arming, which we
won't look at here.
produced on a lucet produced a square braid or lace. This lace
was strong, durable and didn't easily slip when used for garment fastenings.
Many other braids and laces are made using the fingerlooping method-
that is a method of looping the thread around the fingers to form a
kind of knotted braid. Plaiting is also another method of making laces
for clothing or shoes.
Front lacing on kirtles and gowns can be seen abundantly in paintings.
Many images of the Madonna breastfeeding show the front of her kirtle
unlaced. Shown at left is a detail from Bouquet'sVirgin and Child
Surrounded by Angels, dated 1450. Other
images which show front lacing gowns on noble women are the 1387 Bearosin
Getting Engaged detail at right from a Prague manuscript and the
Kathryn de Mortimer funeral effigy.
Lacing holes seem to be very close set to avoid gaping on the front
of the dress. Lacing eyelets could be somewhere between 2cm and 2.5cm
apart but no more. An upper-class woman's under-dress would almost certainly
be laced. A buttoned dress under another buttoned overgown would not
only be uncomfortable but cause unsightly lumps down the front of the
A working class women would have been likely to wear a front-lacing
kirtle, as she would be able to dress herself relatively quickly and
without assistance. Lacing also provides a very solid closure, affording
a fair amount of structural support which is not possible with buttons
which gape and give way at the buttonholes when too much pressure is
Back lacing on kirtles and gowns are the domain of the wealthy. A working
class woman who did not have a servant to help her dress would not have
been able to lace herself into her clothes unaided. Many paintings and
illuminations show women wearing garments which have no apparent openings
at the front or sides, and therefore probably lace at the back.
books on historical costuming, including Herbert Norris's Medieval
Costume and Fashion and Dion Clayton Calthrop's English Costume
cite back lacing in the early medieval period. In the early period,
lacing seems only to shape the dress from between the shoulder blades
and down the upper to mid back. This kind of lacing did not extend all
the way to the top of the garment as became common later in the 14th
Side lacing on garments is usually seen on images of young mothers-to-be.
The ability to loosen a garment at the side seams to accommodate an
expanding stomach and then pull it tight again after the birth of a
child, made special maternity clothes unnecessary.
There are some images which
show side lacing on domestic garments also- in the manuscript shown
at the right, we see a side laced pink gown and in a 15th century painting
we again see a side lacing on a woman mourning Christ on the cross.